military intervention pros and cons
The use of military force anywhere in the world comes at huge financial cost. So, is military intervention the best solution? This course looks at the major shifts in global affairs, including the use of military force against states committing atrocities. Military Intervention has become a big part of a countrys way of expression towards unlawful crimes committed by terrorist or militant neighboring countries towards small and vulnerable nations. if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[468,60],'humanitariancareers_com-leader-2','ezslot_8',605,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-humanitariancareers_com-leader-2-0');Two humanitarian interventions that are renowned for their huge financial costs are the US interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq. IvyPanda. New York, NY: Routledge. (2020, May 23). May 23, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/military-interventions-advantages-and-disadvantages/. To have a nation militarily violate the sovereignty of another country is controversial. Second, global powers may use military intervention as a last resort, having exhausted all other non-militant options. There have been many examples of successful humanitarian interventions that have protected civilians. Furthermore, the failure of these humanitarian interventions can be partly explained by the fact that foreign military planners and politician lacked understanding of local culture as well as the tensions existing in the Iraqi society. Moreover, the lesson of several such interventions, including those in Haiti and Bosnia, seems to be that prolonged commitments do not stir controversy at home so long as casualties are kept to a minimum, which is more likely to be the case when the purpose of an intervention is defined modestly. There are also diplomatic opportunities that can arise from military intervention. Military intervention can also prevent the spread of violence across borders. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. The answer is not necessarily clear. Operation Desert Fox against Iraq in 1998 employed a modest amount of air power for a short and arbitrary period of time with no goal other than to weaken the adversarys strength to some unspecified degree. Even a stealth aircraft can be shot down. Continue with Recommended Cookies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. An argument in favour of humanitarian intervention is that without taking military action against governments and groups committing crimes against humanity, it could be impossible to stop them from continuing. Smart bombs go astray from time to time, missing their intended targets and occasionally causing unintended damage and destruction. The focus of this debate is the U.S. bombing campaign against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Such disputes included ones with France, the United Kingdom, and Tripoli. Duncan is the founder of Humanitarian Careers. In Kosovo, meanwhile, the refusal to commit ground forces likely increased the vulnerability of the local populace. This is another rationale for implementing a military intervention. A final major argument against humanitarian interventions is that many times events that probably should have had military intervention to prevent have not received international action where-as other contexts have. 22 chapters | These include the NATO interventions in Kosovo in 1999, the Libyan No-Fly Zone in 2011 and the UN Peacekeeping mission in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. This can create opportunities for diplomatic engagement and peace negotiations. IvyPanda. The link if to the courses page. This is because of how often the U.S. has used its military to exert influence on other nations by either restoring stability or asserting its dominance. In a recent Intelligence Squared U.S. debate, two teams of foreign policy experts faced off on the motion "Flexing American Muscles In The Middle East Will Make Things Worse." Domestic opposition to such a commitment can be reduced and overcome by concerted presidential effort and by designing interventions that justify an American casualty level by the interests at stake. Often when military action is taken against a regime that oppresses its people humanitarian intervention is used as a justification. Covert In this article, we will explore the pros and cons of military intervention.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'ablison_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_6',618,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-ablison_com-medrectangle-4-0'); The primary benefit of military intervention is that it can help stabilize regions that are in chaos or facing instability. US-Iraq ProCon.org The critics of this strategy argue that such an approach can turn into an instrument of coercion. A second consideration is the likely costs and consequences of acting, both for the immediate problem and for broader U.S. strategic and economic interests. He has a Bachelor of Science in Education from Southwestern University. The notion of an intervention providing a fixed amount of breathing room, after which the local people and governments will be on their own, is absurd; the United This can help to prevent refugee crises and prevent the spread of extremist ideologies.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'ablison_com-box-4','ezslot_5',630,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-ablison_com-box-4-0'); One of the major downsides of military intervention is that it can result in the loss of innocent lives. Manage Settings This is of the main pitfalls that should be avoided. As was the case in Bosnia, a strong argument in favour of humanitarian intervention is that it can be used to end human rights abuses. This case is important because it shows that sometimes political leaders may not have accurate information (Amstutz, 2013). Programs, Managing Different Generations in the Workplace, Addressing Cultural Diversity Issues in Higher Education, Cultural Diversity Issues in the Criminal Justice System, Praxis Core Academic Skills for Educators - Writing Essay Topics & Rubric, The Impact of a Country's Infrastructure on Businesses, Student Organizations & Advisors in Business Education, Staying Active in Teacher Organizations for Business Education, Carl Perkins' Effect on Technical Education Legislation, Working Scholars Bringing Tuition-Free College to the Community. How To Get An NGO Job In Canada (Complete Guide), 7 Reasons Why Developed Countries Are Rich, 7 Reasons Western Countries Are More Developed, How To Get An NGO Job In The United States (Complete Guide), UN Peacekeeping mission in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, International Humanitarian Law in Theory and Practice, An International Security Series: Genocide. - Definition, History & Examples, American Interventionism: Origins, Pros & Cons, Regionalism in Politics: Definition, Characteristics & Types, Regionalism in Politics: History & Examples, Regionalism in Politics: Importance & Effects, Regionalism in Indian Politics: Role, Causes & Impact, Religious Socialism: Definition, Theory & Criticism, Social Conservatism vs. Social Liberalism, Social Conservatism vs. Fiscal Conservatism, Cultural Conservatism vs. Social Conservatism, What is Social Conservatism? The successful use of military force can prevent further harm Learn about the history of U.S. military interventionism. The Pros And Cons Of Military Intervention Against ISIS. The deployment of peacekeepers can avert a disaster such as genocide. It is the aim. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you Before the debate, the audience at the Kaufman Music Center in New York voted 26 percent in favor of the motion and 31 percent against, with 43 percent undecided. Therefore, the critics of military intervention can say that the deaths cannot be justified by any geopolitical or economic interests. WebMara Karlin asserts that U.S. assistance to foreign militaries is a halfway measure that neither solves the underlying problems of weak states nor achieves U.S. national This cartoon shows how the U.S. thought of itself in the early 1900s as it intervened in many Latin American countries, often making them unstable as a result. Therefore, military and political leaders must ensure that the actions are based on verified information. The Political Economy of Human Rights Enforcement: Moral and Intellectual Leadership in the Context of Global Hegemony. For the prior two decades, he served at the Department of State as an adviser to Republican and Democratic secretaries of state, helping to formulate U.S. policy on the Middle East and the Arab-Israel peace process, and most recently as the senior adviser for Arab-Israeli negotiations. Is Foreign Aid Actually A Good Thing? There are sadly too many examples of humanitarian interventions resulting in more conflict or failing to achieve lasting peace. All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. In the course of the twentieth century, there have been many military interventions into sovereign states. Protective Military Interventionism: The Pros and Cons These include military interventions in the Libyan Civil War, which, although removing the horrific dictator Muammar Gaddafi, also resulted in an extensive civil war that is still ongoing. The database is updated daily, so anyone can easily find a relevant essay example. For example, military operations can help to create a common enemy, which can bring together otherwise opposing countries or groups. International Journal Of Human Rights, 15(7), 1125-1135. Instead, the reason for delay should have been the absence of partners willing to bear the brunt of the operation, an obstacle that might have been overcome by more forceful diplomacy. 2020. As the dispute grew more intense, the American Congress authorized the Navy to use force against French vessels. As a result, people are beginning to question the role of humanitarian interventions. We gathered together a group of experts to weigh in on security assistance and its pros and cons. But there must be limits on U.S. military action when a situation is not dire, when other foreign policy instruments look promising, when partners are scarce, or when other major powers oppose American intervention. Soon after the Quasi-War, Thomas Jefferson authorized the use of the American military in the Barbary Wars in response to pirates kidnapping American sailors and demanding tribute. In addition, it is difficult, if not impossible, to carry out an operation that requires consent at the same time one is threatening (or actually carrying out) a compellent or otherwise hostile operation. Previously, Stephens was editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post, a position he assumed in 2002 at age 28. So, these objections can be used by the critics of a humanitarian intervention. IvyPanda. This discussion suggests that that military intervention can lead to different outcomes. "Military Interventions: Advantages and Disadvantages." Pros And Cons Of Military Intervention - 1112 Words | Studymode Justifying Americas Wars: The Conduct and Practice of US Military Intervention. For instance, the critics of this strategy point out that this military intrusion is more likely to boost the geopolitical aims of economically and military advanced countries. Also problematic is safely destroying or at least securing such weapons from dangerous actors. The U.S. has a long history of conflict intervention starting with the Barbary Wars during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. This is a war crime. The Gulf Wars were also supported by some who argued the U.S. needed to restore stability to the Middle East by fighting against Saddam Hussein, an oppressive dictator responsible for several wars in the region. Your privacy is extremely important to us. Of course, no system is better than the intelligence fed into it; accuracy is no virtue if the target is misidentified, as was the case with the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, or if the intelligence assessment is in itself flawed, as may have been the case in the U.S. attack on an alleged chemical plant in Sudan. New technology is no panacea. A humanitarian intervention is when military force is taken against a country, violating its sovereignty, with the aim to protect civilians and end human rights violations. In order to better understand if military force should be used to protect civilians in other countries, lets explore the advantages and disadvantages of humanitarian interventions. "Military Interventions: Advantages and Disadvantages." Both of those efforts must go on while the White House continues to avoid direct conflict between NATO and Russian troops. The lack of broad political support for humanitarian interventions is an important factor against them. ensure the integrity of our platform while keeping your private information safe. In their opinion, this main purpose of this interference is to impose ones geopolitical interests upon another country (Manokha, 2008, p. 11). It is often hard to examine when a country uses humanitarian interventions as a cover for military aggression as they will continue to sight their prevention of atrocities as a reason for their action. For example, one can speak about the operation of NATO forces in Kosovo. In any case, enlisting in the army is an important decision. One has to be ready to make personal sacrifices and face the harsh realities of service. But, not everything is as bad as it seems. For every con about joining the armed forces, theres a pro that evens things out a little. Pros Central America has suffered heavily from American interventions. In 1912, the Cuyamel Fruit Company even used a mercenary army to install a friendly administration in Honduras while the American government had no response on the issue. The intervention came after the pirates abducted several American sailors and ships and demanded tribute from the U.S. Jefferson refused to pay tribute and instead authorized a small invasion of Tripoli involving the Navy, Marines, and some Greek mercenaries. American Interventionism Origins, Pros & Cons | U.S. Force protection to avoid casualties can and should be a considerationbut not the only one. Another online short course we highly recommend for those interested in humanitarian interventions is The Changing Global Order, also offered by Leiden University. As many interventions have taken place over the years, people often debate the effects of America's involvement in foreign nations. Such coercion thus remains a risky form of intervention in that it cedes the initiative to the target, which has to decide whether to hold out or to compromise. The intention of this policy brief is to summarize the lessons that should have been learned from these experiences. Armed Forces: Pros and Cons of Joining the Military Pros And Cons Of Military Intervention 2023 - Ablison Humanitarian interventions are also almost always used in cases where major world and regional powers can agree to the use of military force. Moreover, a narrow foreign policy based solely on self-interest is unlikely to capture the imagination or enjoy the support of the American people, who want international commitments with a moral component. The dismal showing of the Apache helicopters in Kosovothe difficulties in getting them there and up and runningsounds a warning that the U.S. military needs greater flexibility, which means a force that is easily moved and capable of coping with a wide range of missions in a wide range of environments. For instance, the invasion of Iraq took lives of more than 4400 American soldiers (Gelpi, 2009, p. 258). Since 1900, the U.S. has intervened in Central America over forty times, participating in actions such as deposing governments, annexing land, and policing actions. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield. Efforts during the Persian Gulf War to destroy mobile Iraqi SCUD missiles, for example, were an expensive failure, and attempts to intercept relatively primitive SCUDs with more modern antimissile systems likewise proved unsuccessful for the most part. An argument in favour of humanitarian intervention is that using military force against armies and groups preventing humanitarian access can allow aid to be delivered to people. The successful use of military force can prevent further harm coming to civilian populations. A major point that can be made against humanitarian interventions is that they have a historical record of not achieving lasting peace. International Ethics: Concepts, Theories, and Cases in Global Politics. These include the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Not only that but The notion of an intervention providing a fixed amount of breathing room, after which the local people and governments will be on their own, is absurd; the United States will not be able to turn its back on a humanitarian problem if it gets bad enough or if U.S. strategic interests are adversely affected. Proponents argue that liberating the people of Iraq from Saddam Husseins human rights abuses, spreading democracy in the region, enforcing UN regulations, finding suspected weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), and making the US safer from terrorism in a post-9/11 world, all justified the war. - Definition, Effects & Examples, Types of Legislatures in Government: Help and Review, Presidential Elections & Powers: Help and Review, The Congress: Powers & Elections: Help and Review, The Federal Judicial System in Political Science: Help and Review, The Federal Bureaucracy in the United States in Political Science: Help and Review, The History & Role of Political Parties: Help and Review, Interest Groups in Politics: Help and Review, Political Culture, Public Opinion & Civic Behavior: Help and Review, Public and Social Policy: Help and Review, Fiscal Policy in Government & the Economy: Help and Review, Foreign Policy, Defense Policy & Government: Help and Review, Concepts of International Relations: Help and Review, International Actors in Political Science: Help and Review, International Law in Politics: Help and Review, Global Issues and Politics: Help and Review, Introduction to Political Science: Certificate Program, Sociology for Teachers: Professional Development, Praxis Environmental Education (0831) Prep, Human & Cultural Geography for Teachers: Professional Development, Introduction to Public Speaking: Certificate Program, Introduction to Criminal Justice: Certificate Program, Foundations of Education for Teachers: Professional Development, UExcel Foundations of Gerontology: Study Guide & Test Prep, UExcel Political Science: Study Guide & Test Prep. In some cases, the military may also target civilian infrastructure, such as hospitals and schools, which can further exacerbate the suffering of communities. The lack of long-lasting stability and peace following many humanitarian interventions is a significant argument against them. Most times the U.S. send troops to overthrow autocratic rulers and build democracy. One should bear in mind that the U.S. troops could not find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, even though the existence of these weapons was one of the pretexts of the invasion of this country (Terzuolo, 2005, p. 93). A strong example is the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 that was justified as a humanitarian intervention but resulted in many years of bloodshed. Air power can accomplish many things, but not everything. Kosovo underscored a related limitation; although aerial bombardment over the course of some eleven weeks did help persuade Slobodan Milosevic to agree to NATO terms, it seems apparent that the threat of introducing ground forces made a greater impact. Many people call for the use of military force to stop countries committing genocide. flashcard set. In Kosovo today, the United States should content itself with keeping ethnic Serbs and Albanians safe in their own separate areas rather than undertaking the far more costly and possibly futile effort to recreate an integrated, multiethnic society. | 1 The first major benefit of humanitarian interventions is that they protect civilians.if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'humanitariancareers_com-box-4','ezslot_4',104,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-humanitariancareers_com-box-4-0'); The main aim of a humanitarian intervention is to use military force to stop human rights abuses and atrocities. This means if you a follow a link and make a purchase, at no additional cost to you, Humanitarian Careers will receive a commission.